Week 4 Research Proposal Project: Design (Sampling, Reliability, Validity) Design For this section of your research proposal

Week 4 Research Proposal Project: Design (Sampling, Reliability, Validity)

Design

For this section of your research proposal assignment, you will focus on the sampling, reliability, and validity of your research proposal. This section will include information on sampling, reliability, and validity.

The following components should be addressed in your paper this week:

Information on your sample

· Sampling basic information (age, gender, criteria, etc.)

· Sample size

· Explain why your sample is appropriate for your study

Reliability

· Explain how your data collection process is consistent and reliable

· Explain why your measurement tool is reliable

Validity

· Explain how you will ensure you have a valid sample

· Explain how you tested the validity of your measurement tool

APA formatting, references, and citations are required.

Your research project design should be included as part of your final submission for your research proposal project in week 7 and your research proposal presentation in week 8. Use the feedback you receive from your instructor on your design to modify and improve before submission of your final project in weeks 7 and 8.

Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)

Points Possible: 75

Rubric

NURS_540_DE – NURS540 Research Design Rubric

NURS_540_DE – NURS540 Research Design Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSample

22.5 to >18.45 pts

Accomplished

Sampling basic information (age gender, criteria, etc.), sample size and a clear explanation of why the sample is appropriate for the study is included.

18.45 to >16.88 pts

Emerging

Sampling basic information (age gender, criteria, etc.), sample size and an explanation of why the sample is appropriate for the study is partially included.

16.88 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Sampling basic information (age gender, criteria, etc.), sample size and an explanation of why the sample is appropriate for the study is absent or largely inappropriate.

22.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReliability

22.5 to >18.45 pts

Accomplished

A clear and reasonable explanation of the data collection process is included. A reliable measurement tool is included.

18.45 to >16.88 pts

Emerging

A somewhat clear and reasonable explanation of the data collection process is included. A somewhat reliable measurement tool is included.

16.88 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

An explanation of the data collection process and a measurement tool is absent or largely inappropriate.

22.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeValidity

22.5 to >18.45 pts

Accomplished

An explanation of how the measurement tool is tested for validity is included and appropriate. A clear explanation of sample validity is included.

18.45 to >16.88 pts

Emerging

An explanation of how the measurement tool is tested for validity is included and somewhat appropriate. An explanation of sample validity is included.

16.88 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

An explanation of how the measurement tool is tested for validity is absent or largely inappropriate. An explanation of sample validity is absent or severely inappropriate for the study.

22.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA & Mechanics

7.5 to >6.15 pts

Accomplished

The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. There are no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.

6.15 to >5.63 pts

Emerging

The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.

5.63 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper.

7.5 pts

Total Points: 75


Previous


Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

NUR680: Week 5 Written Assignment Page 1 ` Week 5 Assignment Guidelines: Curriculum

NUR680: Week 5 Written Assignment Page 1 ` Week 5 Assignment Guidelines: Curriculum Design, Regulation, and Accreditation in Nursing Education Assignment Overview: This week will focus on curriculum design, regulation, and accreditation. Upload your paper/presentation by Sunday night at 11:59 pm Mountain Time. Assignment Details: There are three parts to

   ETHICS, CYBER ETHICS, AND SECURITY Transforming Nursing ETHICS, CYBER ETHICS, AND

   ETHICS, CYBER ETHICS, AND SECURITY Transforming Nursing ETHICS, CYBER ETHICS, AND SECURITY Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to two of your colleagues by expanding upon their responses or sharing additional or alternative perspectives. PEER #1 · Courtney Cole Hiscox Challenges In today’s digital age, cybersecurity stands as a paramount

POWERPOINT presentation explaining the key components of your research proposal.  Include the following points: A brief introduction, including your

POWERPOINT presentation explaining the key components of your research proposal.  Include the following points: A brief introduction, including your research questions and hypothesis The significance to nursing An overview of your literature review A summary of your design and methodology Include: Your sample procedures Your data collection procedures An overview

2 references each response Week 9 transforming replies Respond to the fourolleagues by expanding upon their responses or sharing additional or

2 references each response Week 9 transforming replies Respond to the fourolleagues by expanding upon their responses or sharing additional or alternative perspectives. Include 2 references each MOM Emily: Balancing patient care with the requirement for stringent data protection poses significant challenges for healthcare practitioners. On one hand, healthcare professionals